วารสารสมาคมจิตแพทย์แห่งประเทศไทย
Journal of the Psychiatrist
Association of Thailand
ISSN: 0125-6985
บรรณาธิการ มาโนช หล่อตระกูล
Editor: Manote
Lotrakul, M.D.
Sleep
disturbances among nurses of Songklanagarind Hospital*
Tawanchai Jirapramukpitak,
M.D.**
Waran
Tanchaiswad, M.D.***
*
Presented at the 6th Congress of ASEAN Federation of
Psychiatry Mental Health and the 10th ASEAN Forum on
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Bangkok, Thailand, 4-7 November,
1996.
** Department of
Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumtanee,
Thailand.
*** Department of
Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai,
Songkla 90112, Thailand.
Abstract
Objective : To evaluate
the prevalence of sleep disturbances andfactors associated with
poor sleep quality in nurses at Songklanagarind Hospital.
Methods : A cross-sectional
epidemiological study was carried outin all female nurses (n=461)
in Songklanagarind Hospital. Three hundred twenty-six nurses completed
a Thai version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (T-PSQI) and
a sleep survey including questions about factors associated with
sleep disturbances. Factors associated with poor sleep quality were
compared between those nurses with poor and good sleep quality by
using Logistic regression.
Results : There was
a high prevalence (73%) of poor sleep quality(T-PSQI score >5)
in all study subjects. The prevalance of sleep disturbances was
more widespread among nurses working rotating shifts (76.7%) than
ones working permanent day (51.1%), and it decreased with age :
at age 40-60 years 43.75% of the nurses (versus 22.8% at age 21-30).
Sleep disturbances were also related to category of workplaces,
to napping and to recent stressful life events. A logistic regression
analysis showed that rotating shift work and stressful life events
were the major associated factors of poor sleep quality.
Conclusions : This
study revealed that about three quarters of the nurses in Songklanagarind
Hospital had poor sleep quality. Rotating shift work and stressful
life events primarily contributed to poor sleep quality among these
nurses.
Key words : Sleep disturbances,
shift work, nurses
ปัญหาคุณภาพการนอนหลับของพยาบาลประจำการโรงพยาบาลสงขลานครินทร์
*
ตะวันชัย
จิรประมุขพิทักษ์, พ.บ. **
วรัญ
ตันชัยสวัสดิ์, พ.บ. ***
บทคัดย่อ คณะผู้วิจัยได้ศึกษาหาความชุกของปัญหาคุณภาพการนอนไม่ดีและวิเคราะห์หาปัจจัยต่างที่มีความสัมพันธ์กับคุณภาพการนอนหลับของพยาบาลในโรงพยาบาลสงขลานครินทร์
จากข้อมูลการสำรวจคุณภาพการนอนหลับของพยาบาลประจำการโรงพยาบาลสงขลาครินทร์
อำเภอหาดใหญ่ จังหวัดสงขลา จำนวน 461 คน ด้วยแบบสอบถาม Pittsburgh
Sleep Quallty Index (PSQI) ฉบับภาษาไทย ได้รับการตอบรับกลับมา 326
คน คิดเป็นร้อยละ 70.71 พบว่าพยาบาลประจำการที่มีคุณภาพการนอนไม่ดี
(T-PSQI Score > 5) มีจำนวน 238 คน คิดเป็นร้อยละ 73 โดยพยาบาลที่ทำงานเปลี่ยนผลัดไปเรื่อยๆ
มีแนวโน้มที่จะมีคุณภาพการนอนไม่ดีสูงกว่าพยาบาลที่ทำงานผลัดเช้าอย่างเดียว
(ร้อยละ 76.7 เปรียบเทียบกับร้อยละ 51.1) ความชุกของปัญหาคุณภาพการนอนหลับลดลงตามอายุที่มากขึ้นคือพบปัญหาเพียงร้อยละ
43.75 ในกลุ่มอายุ 40-60 ปี เปรียบเทียบกับร้อยละ 77.2 ในกลุ่มอายุ
21-30 ปี นอกจากนี้ปัญหาการนอนหลับยังสัมพันธ์กับสถานที่ทำงาน, การงีบหลับ
และความเครียดในชีวิต โดยการศึกษาปัจจัยที่สัมพันธ์กับคุณภาพการนอนไม่ดีโดยใช้
logistic regression พบว่าปัจจัยที่มีความสัมพันธ์กับการมีคุณภาพการนอนที่ไม่ดีในช่วง
1 เดือนสูงที่สุดคือ การทำงานเป็นผลัด และการมีเหตุการณ์ที่เป็นความเครียด
การศึกษานี้พบว่าประมาณสามในสี่ของพยาบาลประจำการโรงพยาบาลสงขลานครินทร์มีคุณภาพการนอนหลับที่ไม่ดี
โดยมีปัจจัยสำคัญจากการทำงานเป็นผลัดและความเครียดในชีวิต
วารสารสมาคมจิตแพทย์แห่งประเทศไทย
2540 ; 42(3) : 123-32.
คำสำคัญ
การนอนหลับ, การทำงานเป็นผลัด, พยาบาล
*
นำเสนอในการประชุม the 6th Congress of ASEAN Federation of Psychiatry
Mental Health and the 10th ASEAN Forum on Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,
กรุงเทพ, 4-7 พฤศจิกายน 2539.
**
ภาควิชาจิตเวชศาสตร์ คณะแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์ ปทุมธานี
***
ภาควิชาจิตเวชศาสตร์ คณะแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์ หาดใหญ่
สงขลา 90112
Introduction
Although nurses should know
how to take care of themselves and are expected to be healthy people,
a study in Thailand by Luecha et al .1 showed that a
large proportion of nurses complained about health problems. One
of the problems found in a large percentage (42%) of these nurses
was insomnia. Insomnia in this study was only one subjective aspect
of "sleep quality". Other aspects may include sleep duration,
sleep latency or number of arousal, as well as other subjective
aspects, such as "depth" or restfulness" of sleep.2
In addition, poor sleep quality may indicate underlying sleep or
medical disorders.2 Thus, sleep quality is a better clinical
construct to describe sleep disturbances than is using one subjective
complaint.
Sleep disturbances among some
nurses may be affected by several factors. One factor that has been
widely studied is shift work. It was agreed that nurses working
night or rotating shifts had poorer sleep quality than nurses working
permanent day or evening shifts.3-6 The consequences
of sleep disturbances due to shift work are numerous. A study showed
that female shift workers reported higher rates of sleeping pill,
tranquilizer, and alcohol use, as well as more job stress and more
emotional problems.7 Nurses working on a rotating basis
nodded off more at work and had twice the odds of a reported accident
or errors related to sleepiness.8 Shiftworkers had more
complaints in symptoms of gastrointestinal disorders and cardiovascular
disorders.9 Thus, rotating shift work brings about many
sleep problems and consequences.
Another factor that contributes
to poor sleep quality is stress. The occurrence of stressful life
events play a major role in the development of chronic insomnia.10
The stress from situations such as work or personal life change
may also result in poor sleep quality.
The prevalence of poor sleep
quality among Thai nurses and factors related to it remain unknown.
The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of sleep
disturbances and factors associated with poor sleep quality in a
sample of Songklanagarind Hospital nurses in southern Thailand.
Materials and Methods
Procedure and Subjects
A cross-sectional study was
carried out in 1995 in Songklanagarind hospital, a university hospital
in Had Yai, Southern Thailand. The population was all female registered
nurses (n = 461) from all wards, outpatient departments and the
nursing service office. The rate of participating nurses was 70%
(n=321). Mean age of the sample was 29.8 years (sd = + 5.85)
with a distribution into three age groups : 21-30 years (58.0%),
31-40 years (37.1%) and 40-60 years (4.9%). Workplaces were divided
into 4 categories according to some common characteristics that
they share. A medical category (34.2%) consisted of medical, pediatric,
newborn, and psychiatric wards. A surgical category (41.4%) consisted
of surgical, ophthalmic, obstetrical, gynecologic, orthopaedic,
E.N.T, and trauma wards. An intensive category (16.9%) consisted
of ICU, pediatric ICU, and the burn unit. And an ambulatory category
(17.6%) consisted of outpatient departments and the nursing service
office.
Anonymous questionnaire packages
were distributed to all female registered nurses working at least
4 days/week or 32 hours/week and who have worked longer than 6 months
in Songklanagarind Hospital. Participants completed the questionnaire
on their own time and returned them to the authors.
Instruments
Data was gathered with the
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) developed by Buysse et al.2
We used a Thai version that was modified from the PSQI and translated
it from and back into the original English version. The PSQI is
a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances
over a 1 month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate
seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency,
sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use
of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each component score
has a range of 0-3 points. In all cases, a score of "0"
indicates no difficulty, while a score of "3" indicates
severe difficulty. The seven component scores are then added to
yield one "global" score, with a range of 0-21 points,
"0" indicating no difficulty and "21" indicating
severe difficulties in all areas. A global PSQI score greater than
5 yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 89.6% and a specificity of
86.5% (kappa = 0.75, p < 0.001) in distinguishing good and poor
sleepers.2
Included in the questionnaire
package was a general sleep survey containing questions about demographic
characteristics, ward, shift work schedule, physical illness, pregnancy,
children, frequency of drinking coffee/tea, job satisfaction, napping,
and stressful life events during the past month.
Analysis
To investigate factors related
to poor sleep quality, the subjects were divided into two groups
: Good/Poor sleepers. Both groups were defined as follows : Good
sleepers were persons who have a global PSQI score equal to or less
than 5. Poor sleeper were persons who have a global PSQI score greater
than 5.
Statistical methods included
comparisons of frequency (Chi-square tests), with adjustment (Mantel-Haenszel's
test) and logistic analysis. Data analysis was performed using Epi
Info statistical package (version 5) and the logistic regression
program in STATA.
Results
Prevalence of sleep disturbances
Table 1 shows that about three
quarters (73%) of the nurses had poor sleep quality during the past
month. Poor sleep quality was related to age: 77.2% of the 21-30
year olds, 70.2% of the 31-40 year olds, and 43.75% of the 40-60
year olds had poor sleep quality during the past month (X2
= 9.14, df = 2, p<0.01)
Sleep disturbances were more
widespread among nurses working rotating shifts (76.7%) than among
nurses working permanent day (51.1%)(X2 = 13.38, df =
1, p<0.0002)
Poor sleep quality was also
related to the category of the workplaces: 80.9% of the nurses in
the intensive category, 76.7% of the nurses in the surgical category,
72.6% of the nurse in the medical category, and 47.6% of the nurses
in the ambulatory category had poor sleep quality during the past
month (X2 = 9.15, df = 3, p<0.027)
Poor sleeping was not found
to be related to the other demographic, occupational and health
variables such as marital status, pregnancy, physical illness or
drinking coffee/tea.
Other factors associated
with sleep disturbances
As seen in Table 2, there are
2 factors that related to poor sleep quality, napping and recent
stressful life events.
Poor sleepers reported napping
more than 1 time/week (89.7%), while good sleepers napped equal
to or less than 1 time/week (71.0%) (X2 = 4.61, df =
1, p<0.03)
Poor sleep quality was also
more widespread among those nurses reporting recent stressful life
events (80.1%) than the nurses who did not report these(65.2%) (X2
= 9.20, df = 1, p<0.002).
Sleep disturbances were not
found to be related to job satisfaction.
Multivariate analysis
A logistic regression analysis
was performed on the 322 subjects with sleep quality based on PSQI
score. The variables : age (21-30, 31-40, 40-60), shift work (permanent
day, rotating shifts). category of wards (medical, surgical, intensive,
ambulatory), napping (0-1, > 1) and stressful life events during
the past month (no, yes) were entered into a logistic regression
as independent variables. The dependent variable was the quality
of sleep (good, poor) during the past month. In this final model,
we selected only the main variables.
The results in Table 3 show
that, when other variables were taken into account in the logistic
model, shift work and recent stressful life events were the major
factors associated with sleep quality. The risk for poor sleep quality
was 3 times greater in those nurses who were working on alternating
schedules compared to those working permanent day, and 2 times greater
in those who reported stressful life events during the past month.
After adjustment, the other factors entered into the logistic regression
did not affect the quality of sleep.
Discussion
This study is the first attempt
to evaluate sleep quality among Thai nurses by using a standardized
questionnaire. Previous studies gathered data by using a symptom
checklist that did not assess various aspects of sleep disturbances.1,11
The assessment of sleep quality has major clinical relevance, it
can help identify underlying sleep disorders and medical disorders
that could help design appropriate treatment strategies to solve
these problems
About three quarters (73%)
of our subjects had poor sleep quality during the month before completing
the questionnaire. Compared with the study by Luecha et al.1
reporting that 42% of nurses in Ramathibodi Hospital, Thailand,
suffered from insomnia. An explanation is that a high proportion
of the nurses in our study not only had insomnia, but may also had
other sleep problems. Some nurses reported excessive daytime sleepiness.
Some reported their sleep was fragmented and not deep. Because there
have not been any studies on the prevalence of sleep problems in
general Thai population, the results of our study may imply a high
rate of sleep disturbances among Thai people.
Our results that rotating shift
work affects sleep quality of the nurses support the longitudinal
study of Neidhammer et al.3 who found that nurses on
alternating schedule had more sleep disorders. Findings of effects
of shift work have also been reported by Escriba et al.4
who found that shiftwork led to a reduction in the length of sleep
and an alteration in the quality of sleep. Shah et al.5
reported that non- rotational workers enjoyed more frequent and
longer naps and had less disturbances in their sleep patterns than
rotational workers. And Lee et al.6 found that there
were higher incidences of sleep disturbances and excessive sleepiness
for women working night and rotating shifts.
Our study confirmed that recent
stressful life events are related to poor sleep quality. The finding
is consistent with the notion that transient or short-term sleep
disturbances and even chronic insomnia may occur inresponse to various
stresses such as work-related difficulties, interpersonal conflicts,
financial problems, or major life changes such as marriage, birth
of a child, or death of a loved one.10,12
The results of the logistic
regression analysis revealed that, when all factors were entered
into a logistic model, age, category of workplaces, and napping
at work did not affect sleep quality. It may be that these factors
were confounded by other factors. First, with respect to age, most
of the young nurses work on alternating schedule, while the older
tends to work permanent day. Thus the age of these nurses is influenced
by shift work. Likewise, for category of wards, most of the intensive,
surgical, and medical nurses work rotating shift, while the ambulatory
nurses work permanent day. Interestingly, the characteristics and
work load of each workplace might result in poor sleep quality to
some extent, as seen that the highest percentage of poor sleepers
were found among subjects in the intensive category, fewer percentage
was from the surgical category, and the fewest came from the medical
category. However, the difference among these groups was not statistical
significant. For napping at work, there was no significant association
between napping at work and sleep quality. This suggests that the
result presented regarding napping at work is not a direct effect
of poor sleep quality, but influenced by sleep deprivation due to
shift work. This finding is supported by the work of Chan,13
who reported that the proportion of nappers was higher in night
workers than in day, morning, and afternoon shift workers. Akerstedt14
also found that 51 percent of rotating shift worker were habitual
nappers and concluded that for most shift workers napping compensates
for sleep loss caused by the temporal displacement of sleep.
There are some limitations
in our study. First, a Thai version of the PSQI has not been validated
for Thai people yet. It is necessary to do this work. Second, although
the results of our study help illustrate factors relevant to sleep
quality, some factors were not described in details such as stressful
life events and job satisfaction as well as other factors that influence
sleep quality. More work is needed to clarify the impact of these
factors.
Severity of the nurses' sleep
problems may be alleviated by intervention on these major associated
factors. First, sleep disturbances due to shift work is caused by
the circadian regulation of sleep/wakefulness.15 Thus,
we can touch upon some scheduling aspects of work. A schedule with
minimum sleepiness should have a short night shift, rotate clockwise,
have the night shift at the end of series of shifts, and have a
slow rotation. Other strategies are striving for as stimulating
and nonsedentary tasks as possible. Napping, particularly before
the night shift, would reduce subsequent night shift sleepiness
somewhat.15 Recently, an interesting new approach is
the attempt to change the circadian phase rapidly by exposing subjects
to bright light (>2,000 lux) in the evening and shielding them
from sunlight in the morning by use of dark goggles.16
This appears to rapidly delay the phase of circadian rhythm. The
method is promising, but much work remains to be done before it
may have any practical applications.
However, the main task with
regard to management of sleep problem due to shift work is that
of: first, convincing administrators that there is a problem and
that shift work concerns cannot simply be dismissed as a "personal
problem" that the individual shift nurses simply has to learn
to cope with.17
Second, with respect to stress
events, one should be educated about stress-coping strategies and
good sleep hygiene practice.18 Although nurses have good
knowledge about being healthy, they may not be able to cope with
sleep problems well enough.
Future follow-up assessments
of this sample will determine whether sleep disturbances among these
nurses are persistent after sleep intervention.
References
1. Luecha Y, Lauhachinda Y,
Thanooruk R, et al. Health Status of Nurses in Ramathibodi Hospital.
Rama Med J 1990;13(3):170-6.
2. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF,
Monk TH, et al. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index : A new instrument
for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989;28(2):193-213.
3. Neidhammer I, Lert F., Marne
MJ. Effects of shiftwork an sleep among French nurses. A longitudinal
study. J occup med 1994;36:667-74.
4. Escriba V., Perez HS., Bolumar
F. Shiftwork : Its impact on the length and quality of sleep among
nurses of the Valencian region in Spain. Int Arch Occup Environ
Health 1992;64:125-9.
5. Shan MZ. Sleep and wakefulness
pattern of nurses engaged in rotational shift work. JPMA J Pak Med
Assoc 1990;40:245-6.
6. Lee KA. Self-reported sleep
disturbances in employed women. Sleep 1992; 15:493-8.
7. Gordon NP, Cleary PP, Parker
CE., et al. The prevalence and health impact of shift work. Am J
Public Health 1986; 76(10): 1225-8.
8. Gold DR, Rogacz S., Bock
N., et al. Rotating shift work, sleep and accidents related to sleepiness
in hospital nurses. Am J Public Health 1992;82(7):1011-4.
9. Glazner LK. Shift work :
its effect on workers. AAOHN J 1991;39:416-21.
10. Kales A, Soldatos CR, Kales
JD. Sleep disorders : insomnia, sleep walking night terrors, nightmares,
and enuresis. Ann Intern Med 1987;106(4):582-82.
11. Taboonpong N. Impact of
shiftwork on nurses. Program and Abstracts of the Founding Congress
of the Asian Sleep Research Society 1994: 105 (Abstr P-43).
12. Kales JD, Soldatos CR,
Kales A. Diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders. In : Greist
JH, Jefferson JW, Spitzer RC, eds. Treatment of Mental Disorders.
New York : Oxford University Press;1982:473-500.
13. Chan OY, Phoon WH, Gan
SL, et al. Sleep-Wake Patterns and Subjective Sleep Quality of Day
and Night Workers : Interaction Between Napping and Main Sleep Episodes.
Sleep 1989; 12(5): 439-48.
14. Akerstedt T, Torsvall L.
Napping in shift work. Sleep 1985;8(2):105-9.
15. Akerstedt T. Review Article
: sleepiness as a consequence of shift work. Sleep 1988;11(1):17-34.
16. Eastman CI. Improving adaptation
to non-24-hr sleep schedules with bright light. Sleep Res 1987;16:14.
17. Monk TH. Shift work. In:Kryger
MH, Roth T, Dement WC, eds. Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine.
Philadelphia : W.B. Saunders company;1994:542-6.
18. Zarcone VP. Sleep Hygiene.
In : Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, eds. Principles and Practice
of Sleep Medicine. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1994:542-6.
Table
1 Prevalence of sleep disturbances and associated demographic factors
among the nurses.
Factors
(number) % Good sleepers Poor sleepers P values
(PSQI < 5) (PSQI >
5)
Age (n=326) 0.010
21-30 (n=189) 58.0 % 22.8 %
(43) 77.2 % (146)
31-40 (n=121) 37.1 % 29.8 %
(36) 70.2 % (85)
> 40 (n=16) 4.9 % 56.25
% (9) 43.75 % (7)
27.0 % (88) 73.0 % (238)
Marital status (n=326)
ns
single, divorced, 64.7 % 25.1
% (53) 74.9 % (158)
widow (n=211)
married (n=115) 35.3 % 30.4
% (35) 69.6 % (80)
Shift work (n=326) 0.0002
permanent day (n=47) 14.4 %
48.9 % (23) 51.1 % (24)
rotating shifts(n=279)85.6
% 23.3 % (65) 76.7 % (214)
Category of workplaces (wards)
(n=278) 0.027
medical (n=95) 34.2 % 27.4
% (26) 72.6 % (69)
surgical (n=115) 41.4 % 23.5
% (27) 76.7 % (88)
intensive (n=47) 16.9 % 19.1
% (9) 80.9 % (38)
ambulatory(n=21) 7.6 % 52.4
% (11) 47.6 % (10)
Pregnancy (n=326) ns
no (n=313) 96.0 26.2 % (82)
73.8 % (231)
yes (n=13) 4.0 46.2 % (6) 53.8
% (7)
Physical illness (n=323)
ns
no (n=231) 71.5 % 26.8 % (62)
73.2 % (169)
yes (n=92) 28.5 % 27.2 % (25)
72.8 % (67)
Coffee/Tea (n=326) ns
not/not often (n=303) 92.7
% 27.4 % (83) 72.6 % (220)
everyday/quite often 7.1 %
21.7 % (5) 78.3 % (18)
(n=23)
Table
2 Other factors associated with poor sleep quality
Factors
(number) % Good sleepers Poor sleepers P values
(PSQI < 5) (PSQI >
5)
Job
satisfaction (n=325) ns
satisfied (n=295) 90.8 % 27.1
% (80) 72.9 % (215)
unsatisfied (n=30) 9.2 % 23.3
% (9) 76.7 % (23)
Napping
(n=322) 0.03
<1 time/week (n=293) 91.0
% 29.0 % (85) 71.0 % (208)
>1 time/week (n=29) 9.0
% 10.3 % (3) 89.7 % (26)
Stressful
life events (n=326) 0.002
no (n=155) 47.5 % 34.8 % (54)
65.2 % (101)
yes (n=171) 52.4 % 19.9 % (34)
80.1 % (137)
Table
3 Logistic regression analysis : shift work and stressful life events
odds ratio S.E. Z Sig IC 95%
shift
work
- rotating shift 3.05 1.01
3.39 0.000 1.6-5.8
- permanent day 1.00
stressful events
- yes 2.09 0.54 2.84 0.004
1.26-3.49
- no 1.00
|